Hi, On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:54:17AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> People have mentioned several issues in GNU Mach (in particular, there > was one good summary by Olaf, but heck if I can find it in the > archive. Do you guys never change the subject lines?) But there was > at least one glaring omission, and one that is in my opinion Given the > Of course it is impossible to give a comprehensive review of all > issues, but at least this one deserves particular mention, because it > is so obvious. If you ever did I/O-intensive work on the Hurd, you > know what I am talking about. > > GNU Mach does not have any resource accounting, and it has very poor > resource scheduling. Actually, I did mention it as the very first problem, though only in one sentence... Anyways, thanks for the nice summary :-) BTW, the message you were looking for is http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-system-discuss/2007-09/msg00071.html Guess how I found it? By searching for "resource" :-) -antrik-
