Karthik Nayak <[email protected]> writes:
> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -163,9 +174,28 @@ static void quote_formatting(struct strbuf *s, const
> char *str, int quote_style)
> }
> }
>
> +static void align_handler(struct ref_formatting_stack *stack)
Perhaps name it end_align_handler, to make the difference with
align_atom_handler clear.
Also, I think moving this function to be right next to
align_atom_handler in the code would make this more readable.
> @@ -754,6 +816,42 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)
> else
> v->s = " ";
> continue;
> + } else if (skip_prefix(name, "align", &valp)) {
> + struct align *align = &v->align;
> + struct strbuf **s;
> +
> + if (valp[0] != ':')
> + die(_("format: usage
> %%(align:<width>,<position>)"));
> + else
> + valp++;
I agree with Junio that skip_prefix(name, "align:" ...) is simpler for
the same thing.
> + if (state.stack->prev)
> + die(_("format: `end` atom missing"));
Perhaps spell it %(end) instead of just end.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
