On Samstag 05 September 2009, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Samstag, 5. September 2009 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > > On 09/05/2009 03:06 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > well, and your workload asks for rt. But rt also means overhead, > > > reduction of performance. So why cater for 1 in a thousand system and > > > punish the other 999? > > > > There are lots of people mentioning interactivity problems on their > > Linux machines when compared to Windows or OS X. It's not "1 in a > > thousand". > > I second that. My whole system becomes quite unresponsive if I only copy a > file of a couple of hundred MBs from an external HDD, say a video of 600 > MB. OK, it's only a relatively slow laptop HDD, but that shouldn't happen > nonetheless. (Gentoo sources with CFQ as standard IO scheduler). >
retry without forced preemption, with Hz=300 and without noticks. Oh, and maybe without extX.
