-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All,
I don't normally get involved in these threads, but I want to point out another reason for top posting. As a blind computer user, sometimes it is more convenient to top post, because I don't know of a way to make my screen reading software skip over all of the quoted material. I find it more convenient sometimes to hear the newest material first. William On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:51:41 +0100 > AllenJB <gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk> wrote: > > > The problem is that there's no consensus. I top post because I think > > it's much more sensible. Others think otherwise. I live with it. > > > > It's the people who refuse to live with differences of opinion that > > are the real problem. > > > > AllenJB > > > > > It's your choice weather to stay rfc-ignorant and "different". > I shall follow the recommendations of IETF then yours. > > > RFC 1855, Section 3.1.1: > > "If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you > summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just > enough text of the original to give a context." > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 > > > -- > Best regards, > Daniel > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn3RP8ACgkQblQW9DDEZTiMbwCglO03DGm25fY5iwxi8EO+gNuW 75oAn0vzSe7SiHNhsSVuNfrxOogPwTbC =n40v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
