>>>> Sounds like it's a 1.1 device to me. >>> >>> Yep, that's what it sounds like to me too. >>> >>> Dale >> >> But that's OK isn't it? I don't need 2.0 speeds between each webcam >> and the controller, I just need the increased overall bandwidth of a >> 2.0 controller so one of the 1.1 webcams doesn't use all of it. > > The 2.0 controller doesn't _have_ increased bandwith if it's > talking to 1.1 devices. In that case, the 2.0 controller is > transferring data at the same speed as a 1.1 controller.
I thought the total bandwidth available for a controller was different than the bandwidth at which it communicates with one device. You're saying any 1.1 device that uses 12 mbit/s will 100% monopolize a 2.0 controller so no other devices can function? Taking a different approach, since I have 2 USB controllers (EHCIx1, OHCIx1) why can't I operate one webcam on one controller and one webcam on the other controller so they can both function? - Grant >> I get the feeling I have a misconception somewhere along the >> line here. Could someone straighten me out? > > A Corvette going 3MPH will get to the finish line at exactly > the same time as a 4-year-old kid on a tricycle going 3MPH. It > doesn't matter what the controller is capable of -- it matters > what speed it's actually talking. > > -- > Grant
