On Freitag, 14. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote: > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote: > >> Jason Carson wrote: > >>> I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which > >>> says... > >>> > >>> AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop > >>> systems and IDE disks > >>> > >>> ... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so > >>> which scheduler is better for a server. Should I stay with anticipatory > >>> because I am using an IDE disk or switch to something else because my > >>> system is a server? > >> > >> That article is before the work began on the CFS/CFQ scheduler. There > >> has been a lot of improvements made to the CFQ scheduler in the past > >> year. > >> > >> http://kerneltrap.org/node/8059 > > > > CFS and CFQ have NOTHING IN COMMON. > > > > CFS is a TASK scheduler. > > > > CFQ is a BLOCK IO scheduler. > > > > Two completly different fields. > > > > Please stop confusing this stuff, ok? > > > > deadline/cfq/as is block IO stuff > > > > cfs is about 'what app runs next' stuff. > > My mistake. Thanks for clearing that up for me. > > --Joshua Doll
sorry for sounding agressive. That was not my intent *sigh* -- Conclusions In a straight-up fight, the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Even with its numerical advantage removed, the Empire would still squash the Federation like a bug. Accept it. -Michael Wong -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
