Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
which scheduler is better for a server. Should I stay with anticipatory
because I am using an IDE disk or switch to something else because my
system is a server?
That article is before the work began on the CFS/CFQ scheduler. There
has been a lot of improvements made to the CFQ scheduler in the past year.
http://kerneltrap.org/node/8059
I don't know which one would be better for a server. If you aren't
having any issues with the scheduler now I don't see a reason to switch.
--Joshua Doll
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
