Am Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:56:24AM +0100 schrieb Michael: > > According to that, it is connected at udma6 which is the fastest. So > > that is good, I guess. Since both drives is slow to connect, it seems > > this is a trend and may just be normal for these drives. Given I use > > these for data that is only put in use a few minutes after booting, > > which gives it plenty of time to connect properly, then it isn't a > > problem for me. I just wouldn't want to try to put a OS on the thing > > and boot from it. > > > > Any one else have different thoughts? See a problem that is a trend, in > > a bad way? Given two different drives has the same slow connect time, > > maybe it is normal.
> You can transfer some data from a tmpfs and measure the speed. If it gets > anywhere near 4.8 Gbit/s (600 MB/s) its a SATA 3. But only on a fast SSD. An HDD does not reach this speed at all. I have a USB3 to M.2 SATA enclosure with an SSD inside and I get around 400 MB/s for sequential transfers of big video files. I guess the SSD doesn’t get any faster. -- Grüße | Greetings | Salut | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. Blue is greener than yellow.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
