J. Roeleveld wrote: > On 23 August 2017 18:49:39 GMT+02:00, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thomas Mueller wrote: >>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, >> except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) >> where multipart/alternative went through. >>> I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by >> default, and might design an email client to not support >> multipart/alternative at all in composed messages. >>> Tom >>> >> Someone pointed out that it likely did that with that message because >> the message I was replying to was HTML. It seems that if I reply to a >> HTML message, it ignores my settings. I think it should obey the >> settings regardless myself as settings should override what it is >> replying too. >> >> At least I know that messages by default are being sent correctly. >> That >> should correct the vast majority of them. >> >> Thanks again to all. >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) > Some mail clients have a different setting for when replying. Maybe you > missed that one? > Or that should be added. > > -- > Joost
If it has one, I'm not aware of it and I've looked. I think it should follow the settings I have by domain no matter if it is a reply or not. Of course, sometimes I just try to apply common sense. ;-) Dale :-) :-)
