On 23 August 2017 18:49:39 GMT+02:00, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: >Thomas Mueller wrote: >> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, >except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) >where multipart/alternative went through. >> >> I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by >default, and might design an email client to not support >multipart/alternative at all in composed messages. >> >> Tom >> > >Someone pointed out that it likely did that with that message because >the message I was replying to was HTML. It seems that if I reply to a >HTML message, it ignores my settings. I think it should obey the >settings regardless myself as settings should override what it is >replying too. > >At least I know that messages by default are being sent correctly. >That >should correct the vast majority of them. > >Thanks again to all. > >Dale > >:-) :-)
Some mail clients have a different setting for when replying. Maybe you missed that one? Or that should be added. -- Joost -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
