On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:42:36AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote > nope, you just believed all the FUD there has been out there. > i've said it many times, and i'll say it again: > > the only real different is USE="rule-generator" and that's it > > and sys-fs/eudev is constantly out of date and haven't developed any > features of their own
udev, the red-headed stepchild of systemd, hasn't exactly had a lot of new features, either. The following "FUD" brought to you by "Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc." http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html > Well, we intent to continue to make it possible to run udevd outside > of systemd. But that's about it. We will not polish that, or add > new features to that or anything. > > OTOH we do polish behaviour of udev when used *within* systemd > however, and that's our primary focus. > > And what we will certainly not do is compromise the uniform > integration into systemd for some cosmetic improvements for > non-systemd systems. Straight from the horse's mouth, udev won't be getting new features and the systemd maintainers' main target is integration into systemd. -- Walter Dnes <waltd...@waltdnes.org> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
