On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am Montag, 12. November 2012, 02:37:13 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> > On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:17:50 -0600 >> > >> > Canek Peláez Valdés <can...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Alan McKinnon >> >> <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] >> >> >> >> > In trying to solve a general problem, Lennart has a knack for >> >> > breaking Gentoo - this distro does not fit the general problems he >> >> > works on. >> >> >> >> Oh, really? Didn't get the memo. I suppose all my machines (laptops, >> >> desktops, servers and media center) running with Gentoo+systemd (and >> >> what is more, *without* OpenRC) are a fidget of my imagination. >> >> >> >> Regards. >> > >> > Are you in discussion mode or pick a fight mode? >> > >> > I'm hoping it's the former. >> >> Just in discussion mode. The statement "this distro does not fit the >> general problems he [Poettering] works on" doesn't make much sense; I >> thought Gentoo fitted basically everything the user wanted to. >> Therefore, in particular fits the model set by the systemd/udev >> developers. >> >> Case in point: in my use cases, it fits. I just used sarcasm to refute >> said statement. >> >> Regards. > > for people who do like to have /var or /usr on seperate partitions and don't > want to use initrd, Poettering&co are a nightmare. > > They are anti-choice. Gentoo is about choice. Your choice is in line with > Poettering's way to do things. Good for you. > But it is not mine.
I never said or implied otherwise. Regards. -- Canek Peláez Valdés Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
