Am Montag, 12. November 2012, 02:37:13 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:17:50 -0600 > > > > Canek Peláez Valdés <can...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Alan McKinnon > >> <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > >> > >> > In trying to solve a general problem, Lennart has a knack for > >> > breaking Gentoo - this distro does not fit the general problems he > >> > works on. > >> > >> Oh, really? Didn't get the memo. I suppose all my machines (laptops, > >> desktops, servers and media center) running with Gentoo+systemd (and > >> what is more, *without* OpenRC) are a fidget of my imagination. > >> > >> Regards. > > > > Are you in discussion mode or pick a fight mode? > > > > I'm hoping it's the former. > > Just in discussion mode. The statement "this distro does not fit the > general problems he [Poettering] works on" doesn't make much sense; I > thought Gentoo fitted basically everything the user wanted to. > Therefore, in particular fits the model set by the systemd/udev > developers. > > Case in point: in my use cases, it fits. I just used sarcasm to refute > said statement. > > Regards.
for people who do like to have /var or /usr on seperate partitions and don't want to use initrd, Poettering&co are a nightmare. They are anti-choice. Gentoo is about choice. Your choice is in line with Poettering's way to do things. Good for you. But it is not mine. -- #163933
