Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sunday 17 July 2005 00:55, Zac Medico wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
but there is enough stuff out there, that does not work with ntpl.
So recommending ntplonly is irresponsible.
No problems here. I'd expect people to do their own research before making
the switch. Plus, you can swap in a linuxthreads glibc at any time if need
be, right?
yeah, but problems are known. So there are good reasons NOT to use ntplonly or
to advise to use it generally.
And if you mean 'reemerge glibc' you are right, you can always 'swap' them
around.
If you're like me then nptlonly works fine for everything you use. You know
that if a hypothetical nptl problem should arise, you have a quick and simple
recovery plan. I might not have switched if rollback wasn't so simple.
Zac
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
