On Sunday 17 July 2005 00:55, Zac Medico wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > but there is enough stuff out there, that does not work with ntpl. > > So recommending ntplonly is irresponsible. > > No problems here. I'd expect people to do their own research before making > the switch. Plus, you can swap in a linuxthreads glibc at any time if need > be, right?
yeah, but problems are known. So there are good reasons NOT to use ntplonly or to advise to use it generally. And if you mean 'reemerge glibc' you are right, you can always 'swap' them around. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
