On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:25:33AM -0500, reg hughson wrote:
> The idea of Gentoo or 'Linux From Scratch' intrigue me but am not really
> sure of the difference between the two other than Gentoo having a system
> in place to keep your system current. 
> 

Linux from Scratch really is just that, Linux from scratch.  It provides
no package management, no dependency tracking, and none of the
initscript handling that Gentoo does so much better than many of the
mainstream distros do.

Portage is a BIG thing, much bigger than you make it out to be.  I've
been a Linux user since around 1995, and I can tell you that it's one of
the things I wished Slackware had when I was using it.  I tried using
Redhat 5.0 in 1997 and found it only marginally better, and getting
worse and worse with age, and I wound up constantly looking for ways to
get around the screwed up Red Hat packaging system.  And now, I have
Gentoo, and am content.  At least now I have a package management system
that actually manages dependencies in a sane way, and while it could use
some improvement, its a fair sight better than anything else that I've
ever seen so far.  It's not *just* a system for keeping your system
current; it manages the large quantity of software you usually have
installed in a typical Linux box.

Frankly, I think LFS is a good thing to try if you have spare time and
want to understand how Linux works in great detail: there's nothing that
can teach you that so well as actually building it up from scratch.
This is something everyone serious about Linux should do at least once
in their lives, I believe.  However, I imagine it would be a nightmare
to administer such a system in actual deployment as a server.  It would
be an absolute bitch to maintain, keep up to date with security patches,
and upgrade.  That's where Gentoo and Portage come in.

-- 
Rafael R. Sevilla <dido at imperium dot ph>     +63(2)8123151
Software Developer, Imperium Technology Inc.    +63(917)4458925
  "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired
   signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are
   not fed, those who are cold and not clothed."

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to