On 20.10.2018 15:19, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote: >> ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch. >> >> If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of >> their users better, and it isn't causing problems for anybody else, >> I'm not sure why we should be interfering with this. > That's interesting. If it's not security supported, does that mean we can > simply clean up vulnerable versions and drop every arm revdep to ~arm? > > Or are we supposed to keep vulnerable versions around and drop every keyword > except arm? > > Either way means extra care for this arch. > > > > No, keywords status is irrelevant, it is for the security team meaning that they can release a glsa w/o waiting for the stabilization of the security unsupported arches
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
