On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote: > ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch. > > If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of > their users better, and it isn't causing problems for anybody else, > I'm not sure why we should be interfering with this.
That's interesting. If it's not security supported, does that mean we can simply clean up vulnerable versions and drop every arm revdep to ~arm? Or are we supposed to keep vulnerable versions around and drop every keyword except arm? Either way means extra care for this arch.
