On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:35 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > The point of dev is to bring staging warnings so that we can improve > the depgraph. If you really insist, we can start with dev status for > arm64 & mips. But it'd be more readable if we worked on only one arch > simultaneously.
Keep 17.0 ones that were dev as dev then for arm64; 13.0 can all go to exp. The latest arm64 stage3 is 17.0 already. For all of those musl profiles should be fixed by their maintainer (which isn't the arch team). It generates all that noise and it's the main reason I had to do a separation of exp and dev for arm64 and mips, so I can have any sort of readable repoman output whatsoever. Albeit speed helps as well by only checking a subset of all arch profiles, especially for mips. mips we can move a couple back to dev once I revive the glibc on it and can actually do work on it again, but it's lower priority. Meanwhile mips "repoman -e y --include-arches mips" output is useless with musl, unless doing some creative grep -v'ing...
