W dniu czw, 11.01.2018 o godzinie 22∶17 +0200, użytkownik Mart Raudsepp napisał: > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 20:45 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > # ARM64 Profiles > > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0 dev > > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0 exp > > arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/desktop exp > > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/desktop/systemd dev > > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/desktop/systemd exp > > arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/developer exp > > arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/systemd exp > > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0 dev > > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0 exp > > arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/desktop exp > > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/desktop/systemd dev > > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/desktop/systemd exp > > arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/developer exp > > arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/systemd exp > > With this I'll need to run through all of these profiles with > repoman -e=y and wait a long time, instead of just the two (well, with > 17.0 now 4) profiles that I actually care about and checks enough. I > also will see a TON of issues from the musl profiles down below that > main block (it doesn't inherit base or something). > > This would make arm64 work completely impossible, so NAK from me.
repoman has --include-arches option for a reason. Profile statuses are not your private convenience. > Additionally if depgraph wouldn't be broken anymore, we would be moving > them to stable, not some separate "dev" step. > > Same goes for the mips main block changes. But it is broken, and it won't become less broken if we keep ignoring the fact and not reporting new breakages just because one developer can't fix his workflow. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
