On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 19:29:36 +0000 Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote:
> Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > If elibtoolize results in different binaries being produced, then > > > it's done wrong in the first place. AFAIU the primary goal of > > > elibtoolize logic is to fix issues on recent systems with > > > outdated build systems. Which is certainly not something that > > > needs to be done for every user out there. > > > > You probably didn't have a look at what the patches fix. Having a > > quick look at patches there, > > Where are those patches you mention? Those in ELT-patches... > > I could fine one fixing relink to old libs (from / instead of $D), > > I have an open bug for this for a package, both in Gentoo and > upstream. It seems to be a problem with libtool itself, is that > about right? With recent libtools it is most likely to be the package's fault, like wrong/poor usage of autotools. > > another one fixing parallel install. The former produces broken > > binaries, the latter none at all. > > > > I seriously doubt this shouldn't be fixed for every user. > > What "this" do you refer to? Sorry for the confusion, I want to > understand. the bugs
