Alexis Ballier wrote: > > If elibtoolize results in different binaries being produced, then it's > > done wrong in the first place. AFAIU the primary goal of elibtoolize > > logic is to fix issues on recent systems with outdated build systems. > > Which is certainly not something that needs to be done for every user > > out there. > > You probably didn't have a look at what the patches fix. Having a > quick look at patches there,
Where are those patches you mention? > I could fine one fixing relink to old libs (from / instead of $D), I have an open bug for this for a package, both in Gentoo and upstream. It seems to be a problem with libtool itself, is that about right? > another one fixing parallel install. The former produces broken > binaries, the latter none at all. > > I seriously doubt this shouldn't be fixed for every user. What "this" do you refer to? Sorry for the confusion, I want to understand. //Peter
