On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On 11/27/2016 09:06 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> If kernel-2_src_unpack() is called in EAPI6, epatch_user() function >>> inherited from eutils.eclass is undefined. >>> See bug #579188 >> >> kernel-2.eclass currently calls die in global scope for EAPI 6, so >> this change has no real effect. >> >> I would suggest modernizing the eclass before allowing it to be used >> with EAPI 6. For example, patches should be applied in src_prepare, >> not src_unpack. >> > > > Is this change not a step in the right direction? Or should it just be > one big bang? > All or nothing?
A full patch series would make more sense than piecemeal commits I think.
