On 10/15/2016 05:32 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 10/14/2016 07:17 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> On Friday, October 14, 2016 1:09:25 PM EDT Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >>> On 14/10/16 01:05 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >>>> Problem >>>> 2. There are binary packages that end in -bin, which is good. However it >>>> is >>>> not clear if that is an upstream 3rd party binary. Or a binary made by >>>> compiling a large Gentoo package, by a Gentoo dev or contributor on a >>>> Gentoo system. Like icedtea-bin for example, and likely some others. >>> >>> Is there a reason that this differentiation would matter? >> >> In my opinion yes, the following reasons at minimum > > Wouldn't it make more sense to include information on this in > metadata.xml rather than specifying it in the package name? >
Yes. -- -Austin GPG: 00B3 2957 B94B F3E1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
