On Friday, October 14, 2016 4:00:53 PM EDT William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:05:43PM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > *snip* > > > If a package is src_install only, no > > src_compile, it should be required to have a -bin suffix, or -gbin if self > > made. > I disagree with this. > > Remember that src_compile could be in an eclass or the package could be > using the default src_compile for the EAPI. > > Also there may be no need to compile anything; the package may just be > scripts, data files or documentation of some kind.
I was implying something that did not build/compile. All mentioned would be obvious exceptions, as they are clearly not binary only. The requirement would be for binary only packages. An ebuild using src_compile from a eclass is likely not a binary only package. An ebuild installing scripts, text. xml, patches, etc would not be considered a binary only package either. -- William L. Thomson Jr.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
