On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:23:06 +0300
Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:10:40 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 20:40:39 +0200
> > Fabian Groffen <grob...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > On 16-06-2016 19:37:55 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:  
> > > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:52:32 +0200
> > > > Fabian Groffen <grob...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > >     
> > > > > On 16-06-2016 16:37:10 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:    
> > > > > > > P.S. Please don't CC me when replying to my e-mails on the list,
> > > > > > > since I'm already subscribed to the list.      
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Please don't expect others to keep blacklists of people who can't
> > > > > > handle their mail properly, or to generally harm others and ignore 
> > > > > > good
> > > > > > practices because you can't handle your mail.      
> > > > > 
> > > > > You mean ignoring the Reply-To header is "good practice"?    
> > > > 
> > > > It's not being ignored, as you can see by the occurrence of the mailing
> > > > list in CC.    
> > > 
> > > From RFC 5322:
> > > 
> > >     When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the address(es) to
> > >     which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent.  In the
> > >     absence of the "Reply-To:" field, replies SHOULD by default be sent to
> > >     the mailbox(es) specified in the "From:" field unless otherwise
> > >     specified by the person composing the reply.
> > > 
> > > In other words, you sent it to me, while I requested you to send it to
> > > the list.  
> > 
> > 'Suggests'. But if you insist, file a bug and stop bothering me. I'm
> > not maintaining nor developing any mail client.  
> 
> Claws mail definitely allows proper replies; just grep for
> X-Mailer header containing "Claws Mail" in this list and see how
> replies are made.
> 
> It looks like that problem is in how client is configured. That's
> why we are borthering you :)

If by 'proper replies', you mean not using 'reply all', then it's
a serious problem with the people using them. Anyway, your offtopic is
over on my end. If you have any more problems, please bother comrel.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Attachment: pgpxfpieA7O1t.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to