On 16-06-2016 19:37:55 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:52:32 +0200 > Fabian Groffen <grob...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On 16-06-2016 16:37:10 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > P.S. Please don't CC me when replying to my e-mails on the list, > > > > since I'm already subscribed to the list. > > > > > > Please don't expect others to keep blacklists of people who can't > > > handle their mail properly, or to generally harm others and ignore good > > > practices because you can't handle your mail. > > > > You mean ignoring the Reply-To header is "good practice"? > > It's not being ignored, as you can see by the occurrence of the mailing > list in CC.
From RFC 5322:
When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the address(es) to
which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent. In the
absence of the "Reply-To:" field, replies SHOULD by default be sent to
the mailbox(es) specified in the "From:" field unless otherwise
specified by the person composing the reply.
In other words, you sent it to me, while I requested you to send it to
the list.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
