On 08/21/2015 08:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, hasufell wrote: > >> Like allowing that devs may or may not use games.eclass, so that >> users cannot expect consistent behavior for games anymore? > > Sorry, but that is not accurate. Usage of games.eclass has been > deprecated by QA [1] (with the council's mandate [2]), so devs should > not use it any longer. > > Maybe QA should be stricter in enforcing its policies, in order to > avoid such false impressions in future? > > Ulrich > > [1] > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Meeting_Summaries#Games_team_policies_issue > [2] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20140812-summary.txt >
May I remind you that """ - Motion: "The council encourages the games team to accept join requests and elect a lead. In the event they don't elect a lead within 6 weeks, we will consider the team as dysfunctional and thus disband it." Accepted with 6 yes votes and 1 abstention. """ has never happened? There has been no vote, but the team has not been considered dysfunctional. Instead we are just acting like it doesn't exist, more or less. Sounds good? It seems, that QA is currently an "intermediate games project policy team". Is that its job? I don't think so. Maybe QA should have _less_ power.
