On 08/21/2015 12:06 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > This seems quite reasonable, and I welcome QA's efforts at maintaining > uniformity and cleanliness. >
Like allowing that devs may or may not use games.eclass, so that users cannot expect consistent behavior for games anymore? Instead of ignoring the games project _again_ and making decisions above their heads... try to fix the project maybe? Is this becoming a habit now? People who are rarely involved in any games ebuild development suddenly know how games ebuild consistency should look like.
