On 08/12/2015 07:48 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/2015 08:38 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
>>> missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
>>> pretty clear:
>>>
>>> reference the bug only in the summary: 1
>>> don't make any of this mandatory: 1
>>> "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9
>>> "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3
>>
>> I'm in favor of Gentoo-Bug: <url> in case we're voting.
>
> May be "Bug-Gentoo" should be used instead. It's to use the same header
> name format as Debian in their patches ("Bug-Debian").
>
I'm out of the discussion. Do whatever you want with bug references. We
clearly need more different opinions.
Someone end the bikeshed train please.
