On 08/12/2015 05:59 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > hasufell schrieb: >> So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I >> missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is >> pretty clear: >> >> reference the bug only in the summary: 1 >> don't make any of this mandatory: 1 >> "Gentoo-Bug: 123" or similar short form: 9 >> "Gentoo-Bug: <url>" or similar long form: 2-3 >> > > As there was no formal call for a vote, I don't think you can take the > number of voiced opinions as an indicator for the support of an option.
Uhm, why not? When I ask for "++", then that is a rough call for opinions. If someone doesn't voice his opinion, then it doesn't count, just like in a formal vote. The only argument you can make is that you want a formal vote, because the amount of consensus is not high enough (is it not?). I guess you will have the same people participating who have already voiced their opinion here. As a compromise, I guess we could say that people are allowed to do both (but must do one of them). The additional code that this would impose on parsing tools is minor. So, either: ===== app-misc/foo: stabilize and stuff Gentoo-Bug: 333531, 502062, 562062, 502772, 502077 Gentoo-Bug: 502362, 512062 ===== Or ===== app-misc/foo: stabilize and stuff Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502062 ... ===== If people don't want this either, then I'm done with this topic and will do whatever I like, until someone wants to take this the "formal" route. I'm not interested to go there for such a trivial thing.
