Il 16/09/2014 20:02, Duncan ha scritto:
> Rich Freeman posted on Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:55:31 -0400 as excerpted:
>
>> Or they could just clone the git tree, and they can look at per-file
>> logs anytime they want to.
> Give me ro access to a current git repo and I'll *VERY* happily leave 
> changelogs to history along with 8-track tapes and 5.25-inch floppies! 
> =:^)
>
> I was strongly in favor of keeping changelogs (and mandating proper add/
> change/deletion entries) the last time the topic came up, but that was in 
> the context of (web)?rsync being the only viable user sync method and 
> thus changelogs being the only user-local-accessible record.  With user-
> git-repo access, I'll /very/ (very, very, very...) happily leave rsync 
> behind for git, and changelogs along with it! =:^)
>
yes, this probably is the same for everyone, and if it's not it should
be anyway.

Reply via email to