Dnia 2014-09-15, o godz. 15:55:35
"Anthony G. Basile" <bluen...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> On 09/15/14 15:30, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> >> On 14-09-2014 16:56:24 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> >>>> So, I don't really have a problem with your design.  I still question
> >>>> whether we still need to be generating changelogs - they seem
> >>>> incredibly redundant.  But, if people really want a redundant copy of
> >>>> the git log, whatever...
> >>> I don't want them too. However, I'm pretty sure people will bikeshed
> >>> this to death if we kill them... Especially that rsync has no git log.
> >>> Not that many users make real use of ChangeLogs, esp. considering
> >>> how useless messages often are there...
> >> Council had some discussions on this topic:
> >> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20111108-summary.txt
> >> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20111011-summary.txt
> >>
> >> Conclusion back then was that ChangeLog files need to stay.
> > I would have no problem with the council revisiting/changing this.
> >
> > I tend to agree that the ChangeLogs in the portage tree will be
> > obsoleted when we switch to git because git's logging facilities are
> > much easier to use than those in CVS. Not to mention how much smaller
> > the portage tree would be without ChangeLogs.
> 
> If the argument is that there are no Changelogs in rsync, then let's 
> write git hooks to generate them when the repository is mirrored to the 
> rsync host.  The only problem I see is with this is then adding 
> ChangeLog to the manifest and gpg signing it which has to be done at the 
> developer's side.  But, I think the tree that users get from rsync 
> should have the logs.  Having *both* a ChangeLog file and git log is 
> redundant.

Can't we just kill rsync then? The whole ChangeLog seems to take more
effort than the actual benefit it gives.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to