On 27 July 2014 02:12, Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: > > Do not forget modification of eclasses which then require mass bumps!
I'm curious what the -r1.1 technique would do here. I mean, wouldn't that mean you have 2 ebuilds that are identical except for the '.1' simply due to the eclass change? That's going to be confusing. -r1.1 weirdness feels like it may cause more problems than it solves. -- Kent *KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL
