-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Friends,

Michał has documented the shortcomings of dynamic deps in our wiki[0].
(Thank you!) This documentation also includes two of our possible
solutions.

1. Improve dynamic-deps. This is, as Michał pointed out earlier in
this thread a pipe dream.

2. Remove dynamic-deps. This is what I think currently makes sense.

3. This is undocumented in the Wiki, but it is certainly an option: do
nothing. It is of course the worst option; but it is perhaps the most
probably course of action as well...


dynamic-deps do not work, and nobody is stepping up to fix them. PMS
defines a static dependency model, and this is what other package
managers use as far as I know.


Julian,

would you like to share your experiences with Paludis? My guess is
that Paludis is more predictable in this respect. I.e., instead of
breaking stuff, I expect Paludis to simply give up.


Sebastian,

I CC'd you because I would love to hear your opinion on this.


Trofi,

please share your opinion too!



To sum up: My vote is disable dynamic-deps. And I would be happy to
apply a patch that does this with the information I have today.


[0]  <https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Dynamic_dependencies>
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlPNi7oACgkQRtClrXBQc7UP6gEAnnWR7L7hDqvaL64ygDwqaBV/
4upsbo6z2FJK4BehajgA/30wolmft/L9vTR/RzH9Wlsu6+NoUBTBMeJGNuIdBCIl
=++4v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to