On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:16:36 -0500 Alex Xu wrote:

>On 24/02/14 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote:
>> This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been
>> integrated into systemd!
>> 
>> In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd
>> INSTALL_MASK, just use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These
>> ebuilds
>> 
>> - still install udevd into /sbin where a daemon belongs to.
>> - disable the crappy new network naming scheme by default
>> - install the new naming scheme config files into /lib/udev/network/
>> (version >=209)
>> - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd
>> crap.
>> 
>> I have no plans to stop fixing the annoyances the gentoo udev
>> ebuilds have since udev was integrated into systemd in the ebuilds
>> from my overlay.
>> 
>> <div>-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------</div><div>Von: Mike
>> Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> </div><div>Datum:24.02.2014  16:55
>> (GMT+01:00) </div><div>An: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
>> </div><div>Betreff: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for
>> >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade </div><div> </div>On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at
>> >7:58 AM, Thomas D. <whi...@whissi.de> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't
>>> have "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK).
>>>
>>> The current news item draft raises question like "When the 'actual
>>> configuration' is in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what
>>> will happen to people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?"
>>>
>>> Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path
>>> for systemd *and* non-systemd users...
>>>
>> 
>> You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't want
>> unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead.
>> 
>
>While you're whinging about integration, you're sending bad HTML email.
>

Yeah, didn't know my mobile phone's mail client is sending that ugly
mails. Gotta look for a better one...

-- 
Lars Wendler
Gentoo package maintainer
GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to