-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote: >>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any >>> dev on ebuilds that get pushed there >> >> It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games team to back to >> work on it together with community. >> >>> * low quality >> low quality of what? ebuilds? I bet, it is many lower-quality >> ebuilds in the tree. Or do you mean low quality of something >> else? Anyway, it is fixable too. Just let's start work on it. >> > I agree. > > It's better to work with the user community and join efforts than > having yet-another-shiny overlay. >
Gamerlay is not related to the games team and this thread is not about gamerlay which is a project that has failed. I have zero interest to work on gamerlay. It would have to start with removing direct commit access of users. This is a question directed to the games team to revive their overlay and improve workflow (e.g. I have some games ebuilds myself which are still very experimental/alpha in my personal overlay... I'd migrate them there). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSY+lTAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz08EIAI0nJi+ztLakQF81MItn2E/y e3ZOcutk5YNrRrByxpduecvtiR2tx2pNc5v5GvFzVFzyJP+d5ZbbORhaz91ZbRoS y8fCCvt+XjdQ0Q1w/2PnvJklMEzozozz9JbqN5XrDeNhsQEIRXM210gNxQBFAoBw EBY/+gOuAjtuXo1c2CwM2b6jCg1mnShcqMqgedaUdNcRc8l7t63UuTsYF6/bMRxU Tw/uhscSo27SGXD5xDP1cbE7Ikauu0NxCrNxYQOgRyZBgBFbtiVsBWv43Tgaqb4r Ta9q46ALQtdq9ppa+MZH0Ad0bg7x0nXeC1CjtN1chhXGb0zrNxy2edYlYjPio+g= =2qId -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
