Dnia 2013-10-16, o godz. 15:11:09 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/16/2013 02:59 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > -- when in doubt -- ask the maintainer. > > > > We should just require maintainers to document what their slots and > subslots are for in the ebuild. I agree. However, this particular sentence was referring to packages that don't have sub-slots yet. > > 4. You *can not* trust portage's --dynamic-deps anymore. > > > > This one is fairly important. In the past, we often assumed that > > portage will 'update' deps from ebuilds automatically. This is no > > longer correct if sub-slots are used -- since portage simply can't > > know which sub-slot of the dependency was used to build the > > package. > > so we should always revbump when introducing subslots? If you want them retroactively, yes. Of course, sometimes you may just assume users will get them with the next version/revision. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
