-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 16/10/13 09:11 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 10/16/2013 02:59 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> 4. You *can not* trust portage's --dynamic-deps anymore. > >> This one is fairly important. In the past, we often assumed that >> portage will 'update' deps from ebuilds automatically. This is >> no longer correct if sub-slots are used -- since portage simply >> can't know which sub-slot of the dependency was used to build >> the package. > > so we should always revbump when introducing subslots? >
Yes, but that's been recommended since the onset of EAPI=5 and sub-slot/slot-operator deps, so hopefully this is nothing new. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlJeu24ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAYEwD/S5I90mGXS3+z3jdflC5YoKi/ VUaL67/Q2SowHBqa+hcA/jtLhOwC7TCGansk5EYNpcCzMhDF1ALh49K18kGUldae =Nbuy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
