On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 04:43:09AM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:19:43 -0700 > Greg KH <gre...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:50:32AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > Greg KH wrote: > > > > See above for why it is not easy at all, and, why even if we do > > > > know some fixes are security ones, we would not tag them as such > > > > anyway. > > > > > > I think this supports the argument that the better kernel is always > > > the one with the most fixes. > > Define "better"; because 3.10.0 has also been worse than the last 3.9 > release in some ways, despite it having more fixes than the last 3.9.
How was it "worse"? You don't seem to define that either :) Yes, there are always going to be bugs and regressions, but as long as we are fixing them more than we are making them, we are doing ok. greg k-h
