On 2 April 2013 13:48, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> but what's the problem with keeping it and not breaking older >> upgrade paths? >> > > This whole discussion seems a bit academic. Somebody pointed out that > we have a version of bash we might not need any longer. If by some > miracle the bash maintainers weren't already aware of it, they are > now. If they want to keep it around for some reason, who cares? > > There is enough bikeshedding when it comes to treecleaning the > packages that aren't being maintained. I don't think we need to > debate the merits of the packages that are. > > Rich >
I couldn't agree more. It is getting really annoying having to debate package removals every other day. -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
