On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: > but what's the problem with keeping it and not breaking older > upgrade paths? >
This whole discussion seems a bit academic. Somebody pointed out that we have a version of bash we might not need any longer. If by some miracle the bash maintainers weren't already aware of it, they are now. If they want to keep it around for some reason, who cares? There is enough bikeshedding when it comes to treecleaning the packages that aren't being maintained. I don't think we need to debate the merits of the packages that are. Rich
