On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 14:54:22 +0800 Ben de Groot <yng...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> media-video/avidemux (bundled libs) I like this application, but am not so sure about maintaining this... =/ Would it be reasonable to create a new package avidemux-ffmpeg in which we create a version of ffmpeg with their patches applied? Perhaps we can also remove the parts of ffmpeg that aren't used by avidemux to keep the overhead of having ffmpeg twice on the system low. I don't see any other reliable solution, unless upstream is willing to stop bundling ffmpeg and get their patches incorporated on that. But upon reading the progress on Debian, there is barely any progress on that as far as I am aware of; and I'm not willing to maintain a package that has 1) an unpatched ffmpeg that breaks it for people or 2) a bundled ffmpeg that keeps it from getting unmasked / reliable / ... The other approach is for someone to attempt to try to get all these patches upstream, but some of them are undocumented which makes it hard to understand what the changes actually are done for; and at this point in time it is not guaranteed that ffmpeg would take these patches. So, what is the Qt herd's opinion on creating a avidemux-ffmpeg package? With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
