On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:42:27 -0300 Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:25:16 +0100 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:19:36 -0300 > > Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:31:46 +0100 > > > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Although the eclass does 'multilib?' only now, in the future it is > > > > likely to use more fine-tuned ABI flags. > > > > --- > > > > gx86/eclass/autotools-multilib.eclass | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > > > > I think it'd better fit in a more generic eclass like > > > multilib.eclass > > > > Yes, I was thinking about that. Probably would be easy to move > > the relevant functions into it. > > > > The name remains the question -- multilib-utils? :D > > I'd say multilib.eclass; it probably doesn't deserve a new eclass, and > multilib.eclass is already what could be called multilib-utils.eclass :) But that variable requires IUSE... and adding IUSE to multilib.eclass seems like a bad idea to me. I was saying 'multilib-utils' as with the common mistake started with 'cmake-utils', and then forked as 'autotools-utils' (because 'autotools' was taken, I guess). -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
