-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/25/2012 05:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:04:55 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> > wrote: >> Do we need an implementation beforehand? Afaik zac said that the >> implementation would not be very complicated, so why not vote on >> this now/soon? > > Well we can't really compare it to SDEPEND (which is implemented > in Paludis, for kdebuild-1 and exheres-0) without at least a > half-arsed implementation. > > Also, speaking as someone who *has* implemented this kind of thing, > I have extreme doubts as to the viability of the proposal. So I'd > be extremely wary of voting in favour of it until we've been able > to have a play with an implementation. >
sorry? I don't see an answers to any of my questions. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQYcrzAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWztIwH/jXV53rVzF4dAImZbOb/zkD1 MU8JfWnYLirERryoix6lhtvMKlSxSCthU+M0wmKYdQ/Rwo5bqkRrgeSgfLg5xQo+ wn9k6YhiU6a0pWNTpG6WUZM9n6vwXYiqBwTX2QAedaPMCw/SbxQeSeF4bq0XNrRC jmwUXKO3LhhQDREuSFXg55LqBbx9NeFvoPxUlqOf7lPl0jXlbu6B0pR5MpxEqysy IFqglzXMIrguk9u/UxY/Z3lDfDzA1zxI3zgDGUiZ5sVKMtqEg8iDNbdsr9K0Zg0H Qe6mbAFYj3V0Nb6lA6n2/54KjWzVKl9dGtzGQsjwyfu4IdbZNX3O5qi+4Y2CYck= =QaMz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
