On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:29:15 +0100 David Leverton <levert...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > Technically it could, but the issue here would be what you are going
> > to do with a has_version check on an IUSE_RUNTIME dep -- the package
> > should do filesystem-identical installs no matter what status of
> > IUSE_RUNTIME flags, so whatever one would do with a has_version
> > check would have to not change any part of the build or
> > installation.
>
> In principle it would be used for more or less the same thing as it
> would in a dependency, i.e. check whether the runtime-only
> dependencies for that feature are satisfied - the difference being
> that the package can specify arbitrary if-yes and if-no behaviours,
> rather than just "fail the dependency resolution" or not. (Modulo
> the problem being discussed in this subthread, that a "no" answer
> isn't reliable.)
>
> For example, some tool used during the build might have a "slow" mode
> that always works, and a "fast" mode that requires some other program
> to be installed and that has to be requested explicitly. So the
> package that uses the tool might want to do something like
>
> src_compile() {
> if has_version dev-util/buildtool[fast]; then
> buildtool --fast
> else
> buildtool
> fi
> }
And that particular example should be perfectly valid, to be honest.
There is just a little risk that fast mode wouldn't be used when it
could.
Of course, it's quite unlikely that such an option was actually based
on runtime dep...
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
