On Saturday 18 August 2012 02:01:12 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work.  forcing people to use
> > 1.50 is purely the boost's maintainers choice.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > there's a trivial patch long been available that you've refused to merge.
> >  so any errors here are of your choosing.
> 
> So you pretend that people apply "trivial patches" because you're in a
> hurry to unmask something

yes, the patch here is trivial.  it removes 1 line of unused code and has fixed 
a lot of other packages.  deflecting the argument to a flawed system of your 
own 
creation doesn't change it.  if you're worried about gnutls breakage, you've 
only yourself to blame.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to