On Saturday 18 August 2012 01:16:29 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > - everything depending on boost (current 1.49 won't work, you need > 1.50, and quite a few things break with 1.50);
there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use 1.50 is purely the boost's maintainers choice. > - everything depending on gnutls (current 2.x version does not build > with glibc 2.16, and quite a few things don't build with gnutls 3); there's a trivial patch long been available that you've refused to merge. so any errors here are of your choosing. > Congrats, this is just the kind of behaviour that makes Gentoo look > professional... no wait I meant the other way around I guess. Because > the automake 1.12 breakage is not enough to have in tree, hm? *yawn*. don't use unstable if you want stability. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
