>>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:00:32 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Zac Medico wrote: >> > If we do go with a variant of GLEP 55, I'd prefer a variant that >> > uses a constant extension (like .eb) and places the EAPI string >> > just after the version component of the name. For example: >> >> > foo-1.0-r1-eapi5.ebuild >> >> This is so ugly... I guess I'll retire the same day when such an >> abomination gets accepted. ;-)
> I'm sorry, we're down to "it's ugly and someone already said no and > I'll throw my toys out of the pram if I don't get my way" as the > arguments against GLEP 55 now? Note the smiley in my posting. And yes, it _is_ ugly. >>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > The person who wrote it is one of Satan's little minions. Also, > change is bad. And you think that this is better? Ulrich
