On 03/12/2012 10:12 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:05:46 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> See above, even if we should ever move away from bash, GLEP 55 is >> still not needed. > > ...but we might as well go with GLEP 55 anyway, since GLEP 55 > definitely works, whereas other solutions might work so long as we > don't do something unexpected. > > This whole thing is just an exercise in trying to find excuses not to > use GLEP 55.
If we do go with a variant of GLEP 55, I'd prefer a variant that uses a constant extension (like .eb) and places the EAPI string just after the version component of the name. For example: foo-1.0-r1-eapi5.ebuild -- Thanks, Zac
